part 2 of the interview series has now been uploaded to youtube.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmewxug3kck.
for those who are unfamiliar, this is the second part of a series of videos covering an interview with candace conti and rick simons where the questions were posed by members of this forum.. questions answered in this video are.... .
(to rick, asked by hoffnung) why was watch tower bible & tract society of pennsylvania, together with more watchtower corporations, not sued as well?.
Chaserious said...
"it comes across that she answered the question in a very coached manner, perhaps so as to avoid giving a clear answer that she could be confronted with in court in the event a new trial is ordered."
"I am not reading anything into it or perpetuating anything."
So have you been on other forums Chaserious?
part 2 of the interview series has now been uploaded to youtube.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmewxug3kck.
for those who are unfamiliar, this is the second part of a series of videos covering an interview with candace conti and rick simons where the questions were posed by members of this forum.. questions answered in this video are.... .
(to rick, asked by hoffnung) why was watch tower bible & tract society of pennsylvania, together with more watchtower corporations, not sued as well?.
"personally" I'm not buying it. I feel there's a smarminess to Chaserous other posts re the Conti case as well. What I'd like to know is if Chaserous has been on other forums? Also, It seems he/she has experience with law and knows exacty what he/she is doing.
144,000, Band and others have had opinions and statments re the Conti case as well, but for some reason Charserous posts read with motive, in my opinion of course.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/unctuous unc tu·ous·ness, unc tu·osi·ty (- s -t ) n. Synonyms: unctuous, fulsome, oily, oleaginous, smarmyThese adjectives mean insincerely, self-servingly, or smugly agreeable or earnest: an unctuous toady; gave the dictator a fulsome introduction; oily praise; oleaginous hypocrisy; smarmy self-importance/ smarm·y (smär m) adj. smarm·i·er, smarm·i·est 1. Hypocritically, complacently, or effusively earnest; unctuous. See Synonyms at unctuous. 2. Sleek. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smarmy Definition of SMARMY1 : revealing or marked by a smug, ingratiating, or false earnestness <a tone of smarmy self-satisfaction — New Yorker> 2 : of low sleazy taste or quality <smarmy eroticism> |
part 2 of the interview series has now been uploaded to youtube.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmewxug3kck.
for those who are unfamiliar, this is the second part of a series of videos covering an interview with candace conti and rick simons where the questions were posed by members of this forum.. questions answered in this video are.... .
(to rick, asked by hoffnung) why was watch tower bible & tract society of pennsylvania, together with more watchtower corporations, not sued as well?.
The only reason I "think" Candace answered that question, was to clear the air for those who are not Candace haters.
The only reason I answered this question is not for Chaserious benefit (still suspect of passive/agressive posts re Conti case), but because there are MANY invisible peepers of all sorts.......
it's been a while since we heard about their engagement.
did they break it off?
did they get married?.
Oh my.....you're right slimboyfat!!! Not daughter, but grand daughter..
She looks even younger then Hugh Heffs new wife. She'll be rolling him around and feeding baby food in no time......
part 2 of the interview series has now been uploaded to youtube.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmewxug3kck.
for those who are unfamiliar, this is the second part of a series of videos covering an interview with candace conti and rick simons where the questions were posed by members of this forum.. questions answered in this video are.... .
(to rick, asked by hoffnung) why was watch tower bible & tract society of pennsylvania, together with more watchtower corporations, not sued as well?.
these sick "apologists" are on other forums. I've see it for myself. They've made horrible statments, like, Candace asked for her molestation, the prostitution comment, as well as other terrible comments. I couldn't believe this hate speech was coming from JW's, period.
I know for a fact, not all JW's are as these, but it sure was a real eye opener.
part 2 of the interview series has now been uploaded to youtube.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmewxug3kck.
for those who are unfamiliar, this is the second part of a series of videos covering an interview with candace conti and rick simons where the questions were posed by members of this forum.. questions answered in this video are.... .
(to rick, asked by hoffnung) why was watch tower bible & tract society of pennsylvania, together with more watchtower corporations, not sued as well?.
We all know who the WTS says THE REAL prostitue is, which the WTS has PROVEN to be........
Humm....I dunno, maybe, I should assume you cynical and suspect Chaserious, for your recent postings....they seem, well, suspect.....
part 2 of the interview series has now been uploaded to youtube.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmewxug3kck.
for those who are unfamiliar, this is the second part of a series of videos covering an interview with candace conti and rick simons where the questions were posed by members of this forum.. questions answered in this video are.... .
(to rick, asked by hoffnung) why was watch tower bible & tract society of pennsylvania, together with more watchtower corporations, not sued as well?.
Much is answered re questions and speculation.
THANK YOU, Cedars!! Truly appreciated
it's been a while since we heard about their engagement.
did they break it off?
did they get married?.
she looks young enough to be his daughter, and he looks like a dirty old man....
as most suspected, the wts filed their brief, at least it looks that way..... http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=1&doc_id=2025979&doc_no=a136641.
it also notes aob in excess of word count limit.. wonder if they did that to buy more time?.
I first read it here, http://forum.freeadvice.com/marriage-domestic-partnerships-other-family-law-matters-45/clergy-confidentiality-47138.html then confirmed this with Rick Simons himself.
as most suspected, the wts filed their brief, at least it looks that way..... http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=1&doc_id=2025979&doc_no=a136641.
it also notes aob in excess of word count limit.. wonder if they did that to buy more time?.
Resistance is Futile even then, penitential communication has to be between "one" Clergy member "in confindence", in "private", no second or third party, no sharing records/files at all, no other witnesses to the confession, no one else overhearing, or it will not be upheld.
Again, Clergy in Calif are mandated to report. http://www.cdss.ca.gov/cdssweb/entres/forms/English/PUB132.pdf
Also, Kendrick was already on file with police as a pedo. Elders knew. He is supposed to be kept at certain distance from Children. They still had him near children, and going door to door.
